Ben Selin
Comm313
01/03/2012
Appropriation
1.
The Pictures Generation
a.
The Pictures Generation included artists like Cindy
Sherman, Robert Longo, David Salle, Richard Prince, Jack Goldstein and Sherrie
Levine. Although not mentioned in the article in my opinion Andy Warhol was a
kind of precursor and inspirer to the Pictures Generation.
b.
The Pictures Generation grew up in an age of
political turmoil and media avalanches.
c.
Their work exuded a rebel attitude that was
exemplified in their work. Most of the Pictures Generation’s art was little
more than appropriated images cut out or collaged with others. They often
created funny scenarios or powerful ideas that any one image couldn’t have
shown.
d.
Not all of the Pictures Generation art was
appropriated. Some art was original photography staged for the occasion. Often,
artists recreated original art work in their own light. Toys were also often
used as subjects of their photos.
2.
Fair Use
a.
In the article Richard Prince’s Canal Zone
series of photos was accused of copyright infringement. Richard Prince used the
defense of fair use. In this case I think fair use is a bit questionable. One
of the big fair use rules uses parody to justify it, but only by parodying the
actual art being used. In the case of Prince’s works they are more parodying
society which did not hold over with Jim Koons us of Art Rodger’s photo
“Puppies”. In this case I tend to agree. Prince’s modified photos are
interesting and do add something to them, but is it fair use? I’m hesitant to
say yes.
b.
An example of fair use on the internet is the
creation of thumbnails for use in search engines. I totally agree with this
use. It makes sense that search engines should be able to create these
thumbnails to make searching much easier. At first it seems an obvious example
of fair use, but if you really think about it the search engines are creating
exact of copies of original copy written works. The ruling is that they are
small enough and are not meant to be viewed at the size of the original work.
3.
Appropriation
a.
I think the internet has completely muddled the
fair use laws and they should be retooled. People tend to use pictures they
find on the internet without ever thinking about and I think it should be ok to
do so. People who don’t want their work used should be more careful by
including watermarks and keeping resolutions low.
b.
With that in mind I am a profound user of other
people’s work. I tend to forget that other people should receive money for me
using it or modifying it. It is just so easy to count something that you
doctored and modified to be your own original work. I tend to very casual with
intellectual property, being a kid money and property in that sense has so much
less meaning it is easy to forget that it’s technically stealing. Also me being
so young I think I would be flattered to have someone use my work. Although I
would probably want some sort of compensation.
c.
On the other hand I work for a professional
photographer and he is very particular about people using his property and
using other people’s property. In his line of work it is very important to
uphold these copyright laws. He wouldn’t have a job if people could steal is
photos off of his website or by other means.
0 comments:
Post a Comment